Wednesday, December 29, 2010

So Long To One of My Favorite Couples.

 This is the 1st Anniversary of Barbara & Jim's 25th.  Some think Barbara is in a boomerang place and it will work out.  It won't. They've moved on.  A couple of days ago though, I did hear Jim singing the chorus of Hard Dog, just as he used to sing it to her:

"I give you my love and I give you my money
but you've got the feelings of a fence post honey.
I don't hold a grudge I just carry a torch.
You're a hard dog to keep under the porch."

No, that's not why she left.  
Here's to a  pretty good cowboy and and a pretty good cowgirl,  They are still a couple of my favorite individuals.  Happy trails.


The Work of Christmas.

When the song of the angels is stilled,
When the star in the sky is gone,
When the kings and the princes are home,
When the shepherds are back with their flocks,
The work of Christmas begins:
To find the lost,
To heal the broken,

To feed the hungry,
To release the prisoner,
To rebuild the nations,
To bring peace among people,
To make music in the heart.


When The Song of Angels Is Stilled by Howard Thurman 
Thanks to Rev. Sandi.

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Public Service Announcement-Schedule Change.

The OZO Dub Stars v Dublin camogie and ladies football games scheduled for Tuesday 28 December at Kilmacud Crokes have been deferred until Saturday 15 January 2011 due to the bad weather.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

It Used To Be Santy.

When I was very small.  In Coal Hill?  Ozark?  Rogers?  I don't know.  Surely not Fedvul. 

Monday, December 13, 2010

Land a Goshen!

"This . . .  picture from [a] game camera in Goshen, Arkansas. Only 2 people know where the camera actually is and it not the easiest place to play a joke or get to at  1:44 am. I was just seeing if you guys have seen anything ever like this before or can help identify. We are all just a little more afraid to deer hunt in NWA now."  From a report to the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission last Wednesday, December 8, 2010.
So far Game & Fish has not been able to identify the creature, but there is speculation that it is a zombie.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Potential Lasts

I don't wear shoes a lot anymore, but I have a bunch of socks.  It hit me this morning that I'll probably never need to buy another sock in my life.  The same is probably true for cars.  
 

Friday, December 10, 2010

We Have a Lot to Ponder and to Be Thankful for This Holiday Season

Fridays at the Pentagon


"These are our men, broken in body they may be, but they are our brothers, and we welcome them home. This parade has gone on, every single Friday, all year long, for more than four years." Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2007/05/23/16478/a-must-read-for-memorial-day-52307.html#storylink=misearch#ixzz17isQPzKp
Though this was written for Memorial Day, it's appropriate at any time, especially during the holidays when we often give thanks, but, in the revelry forget those who give so much and those who are in need.  Thanks to Ken 
Let's also remember those who don't get to come home.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010

Let's all live up to our capacity....

"In everyone there is the capacity to wake up, to understand, to love."
- Thich Nhat Hanh, from Being Peace

Monday, December 06, 2010

"If 'ifs' and 'buts' were candy and nuts, wouldn't it be a Merry Christmas?" 'Dandy Don' Meredith (1938-2010)

Christmas won't be as merry without you Don.  Thanks for the laughs. I got to see you play in 1958 I think.  You were a pretty fair country football player too.  Thanks for the thrills.

If You're Going to Put Christ Back in Christmas, Do It Right.

HOLIDAY DECOR ALERT: "Decide if you are going to have a Matthew nativity or a Luke nativity. Matthew says Mary and Joseph lived in Bethlehem (so I suggest a lot of homespun carpentry -- with no faux finishes). Luke says they lived in Nazareth (so go with that dreadful stable look). Matthew says wise men. Luke says shepherds. Neither says both. Decorate accordingly." Mrs. Betty Bowers

Thursday, December 02, 2010

What we say to children

"Each second we live is a new and unique moment of the universe, a moment that will never be again And what do we teach our children? We teach them that two and two make four, and that Paris is the capital of France. When will we also teach them what they are?

We should say to each of them: Do you know what you are? You are a marvel. You are unique. In all the years that have passed, there has never been another child like you. Your legs, your arms, your clever fingers, the way you move.You may become a Shakespeare, a Michelangelo, a Beethoven. You have the capacity for anything. Yes, you are a marvel. And when you grow up, can you then harm another who is, like you, a marvel?You must work, we must all work, to make the world worthy of its children."Pablo Casals (1876-1973)Spanish Cellist

Wednesday, December 01, 2010

Lest We Forget Lester Maddox

Rogers Name Change Put On Hold As Maddox Moves Back To Gravette.

The plan to change the name of the city of Rogers to East Gravette has been temporarily shelved after Kurt Maddox’s drubbing in the Rogers mayoral race.  See. Rogers to Change Name to East Gravette.   Kurt has left Rogers, his residence of three months, to return to Gravette. See, Mayoral Candidate Moves Back To Gravette in the Morning News.  It is unknown whether he will return to his Gravette city council post or run for mayor there. Though Kurt did not look back as he left Rogers, [rumors that his wife did and was turned into a pillar of salt are unsubstantiated] he has not given up on the name change, and God willing, will make another attempt after the city is purified..  This may be in the near future.  “A city won’t last long with a Methodist as mayor” a campaign aid said.  “God won’t put up with it, and the entire Duggar clan will move to Rogers and vote next time if necessary,” he added.   
Thanks to Donnie

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Tyrants

It's attributed to Mohandas Gandhi...."The only tyrant I accept in this world is the still voice within." What's required is a change in the human heart. Love is sufficient. Speak up.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Political Mudslinging and The Liberty Valence Effect

'They' say, "all's fair in love and war." 'They' should have added politics. Unfortunately today's political races have unloosed a barage of inuendo, half-truths and sometimes down-right lies. With accessability to almost instant up-to-the minute information, we are bombarded with so much of the mud slinging we begin to feel like we need a shower.
If only we could go back to the good old days when political races followed honorable, genteel rules. The candidates ran on their merits alone. Of course in reality, the good old days didn't exist. In fact, the United States has a long storied history of mudslinging. In 1800, Jefferson hired a writer to attack President Adams stating, "[he is] a hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensability of a woman." In 1876, the opponents of Rutherford B. Hayes spread a rumor that he had shot is mother. In 1836, Davy Crockett accused Martin Van Buren of wearing women's clothing, "He is laced up in corsets." One of the more colorful slings was by Harry Truman while campaigning for Kennedy in 1960, "If you vote for Nixon, you ought to go to hell!"
Of course the difference in past political races and today is the mass media: internet, facebook, twitter and blogs. The information is so readily available and so in-your-face, you can hardly avoid it. Unfortunately, we've become such a voyueristic society (there are now at least 3 channels devoted entirely to reality tv: Fox Reality in the U.S., Global Reality Channel in Canada, and Zone Reality in the U.K.), we're soaking up all this information without a filter and without verification of the facts. This presents a problem. We end up believing what we read/hear and what's worse, we believe the false information even if we are presented with the truth later.
University of Michigan social psychologist Norbert Schwartz conducted a study published this year in the journal Advances in Experimental Social Psychology that shows the brain will use a "rule of thumb" that will bias itself into thinking false information is true. In an experiment, people were given false information then shortly after given the correct information. While some people would believe the corrected information, some would hold onto the falsehood. As time went by however, fewer and fewer people would believe the corrected information and would hold onto the falsehood as fact. Long-term memories were shown to matter most in political campaigns and were the most susceptible to the bias of thinking that falsehoods were actually true. This is not to say that we're a bunch of blind, gullible dopes, but that our own experiences and belief systems are susceptible to certain information. When that information is repetitively received, it becomes easier to believe.
So, what are we to do? There is no easy answer to this question nor is there a 'fix-it' for our brains. A healthy dose of scepticism when reading or hearing any information seems to be the best course of action especially when we hear the same information repeatedly. We as humans will never be able to escape our want of a good story. Political campaign experts know this and are good at using this to their advantage. Always remember the lesson taught in "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence." Jimmy Stewart's character had become famous for ridding the people of Liberty Valence. His fame led him to a successful political career all based on a lie--he hadn't really shot Liberty Valence. When he confesse to his biographer at the end of the movie that John Wayne's character was really the one who did it, the biographer tears up his notes and says, "When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." So be careful when you believe what you read.

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Lighten Up

"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."  François-Marie Arouet

Sunday, November 07, 2010

Tom Joad votes Republican

The Joad family is sitting around a campfire at a Hooverville outside Bakersfield, Calif.  . . .
Connie has caught a possum, at least he said it was a possum, and they're waiting for the possum stew to boil.
Tom Joad walks into the glow of the campfire. "Where ya' been, Tom?" Ma asks.
"Been down to the overseer's house," says Tom. "Done made up my mind. I'm voting Republican this year."
There is a gasp from everyone around the campfire. . . "Tom said, spitting into the fire. "I seen it TV down at the overseer's house. Was the Democrats that done it. Was that Obama fella."
"What are you talkin' about, Tom?" Jim Casy asks. "Was the banks that done this to us."
"Yeah? And who was it that bailed out the banks? I didn't know it until I saw on the TV, but that was Obama." . . .
"I don' un'erstan'," Ma says. "I don't really know."
"Me neither," Tom says. "Alls I know is I'm mad."
Excerpt from "The Grapes of Wrath" — the sequel. Tom Joad votes Republican by Kevin Horrigan click here to read it.
Thanks to Garry & Myra

Tuesday, November 02, 2010

Isn't that interesting?

Did you know that: .....

The word "racecar" spelled backwards still spells "racecar"?

"Eat" is the only word that, if you take the first letter and move it to the last, spells its past tense, "ate"?

And if you rearrange the letters in "Tea Party Republicans," and add just a  few more letters, it spells: "Shut the fuck up you free-loading,
progress-blocking, benefit-grabbing, resource-sucking, violent, hypocritical douche bags, and deal with the fact that you nearly wrecked the country under Bush and that our President is Black, so get used to it."

Thanks to Lynn & Judge C.
 


Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Yes Virginia, You Are An Arrogant, Insensative, Self-Centered, Out of Touch, Nut Job. Should She Apologize to Arlan Spector Too?

"The wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas called Anita Hill to ask her to apologize for accusing the justice of sexually harassing her, 19 years after Thomas' confirmation hearing spawned a national debate about harassment in the workplace.
Virginia Thomas said in a statement Tuesday that she was "extending an olive branch" to Hill, now a Brandeis University professor, in a voicemail message left over the weekend.
In a transcript of the message provided by ABC News, which said it listened to the recording, Thomas identified herself and then said, "I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. So give it some thought and certainly pray about this and come to understand why you did what you did. OK, have a good day," Thomas said.
When Hill heard the voicemail, she contacted Brandeis' public safety office, which in turn informed the FBI.
"I certainly thought the call was inappropriate," Hill, who worked for Clarence Thomas in two federal government jobs, said in a statement released Tuesday night.
"I have no intention of apologizing because I testified truthfully about my experience and I stand by that testimony," she added.
In her statement, Virginia Thomas said she did not intend to offend Hill.
"I did place a call to Ms. Hill at her office extending an olive branch to her after all these years, in hopes that we could ultimately get passed (sic) what happened so long ago. That offer still stands, I would be very happy to meet and talk with her if she would be willing to do the same," Thomas said.
FBI Special Agent Jason Pack, a spokesman at bureau headquarters in Washington, declined to comment on the voicemail."
Justice Thomas' Wife Tries to Contact Anita Hill Wife of Justice Clarence Thomas leaves voice message with Anita Hill, justice's accuser By MARK SHERMAN

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

The Mad Tea Party; a looking glass view of economic reality.





Have I passed through a looking glass mirror into a world of inverse economic reality?  Many are upset about bailouts, economic malaise and mounting public deficits.  There is nothing strange about expressing such at the polls, unless it means voting back into power the mind set that brought us the mess in the first place!  As a frightened squirrel about to make it safely across the road suddenly cuts back to disaster, the self styled Tea Partiers seem intent on taking us all on another pass under the wheels of conservative economic dogma.  I am looking for Alice, perhaps she knows the way back to the other side of this inside out world! 


The Tea Party madness has been stoked by the Mad Haters of monied interest news (FOX - as in the hen house).  It is simple really, conservative media tells their audience what they want to hear, in consideration of their well cultivated prejudices and preconceptions that is.  It is good business and good politics, from their point of view.  Focused on the painful nature of the economic cure, the audience readily forgets the disease, especially as most of them voted for the cause in the first place.  


In the Tea Party mind this is all about runaway socialism, not about recovering from the brink of economic collapse.  To anyone that has not fallen down the Mad Haters’ rabit hole of propaganda, it is plain how close cowboy laissez faire economics brought us to utter calamity.  It is a miracle that we are in a recovery at all.      


Mired in economic malaise and national decline, our political process is not working.  The Republican party has long sense ceased to offer an intellectually defensible counterpoise to the Democratic party.  While, any political party is hostage to its native constituencies to some extent, the Republican party has become a wholly owned engine of manipulation.  Run by and for various forms of concentrated wealth, it depends upon emotional manipulation to achieve election majority.  Fusing the politics of greed with the politics of ignorance, the party taps and cultivates xenophobia, homophobia, gunomitophobia, huntomitophobia, raceophobia, along with various economic, religious and political dogmas; playing on emotions not to reason in pursuit of its owners’ special interest agenda.  


For a generation, the Democratic party has failed to project a reality based vision to counter the Republican party’s fear and faith illusions. lacking faith that the American electorate is capable of responding to intellectual arguments, the Democratic party has condemned itself to a fruitless search for its own emotional levers.  


Economics provides an example.  The central Republican economic dogma is that only the private sector delivers prosperity, the public sector can only be in the way and jobs and prosperity depend upon low tax rates for the wealthy; it is the American way.  These twin messages are delivered as if in surround sound with the regularity of a prayer wheel.  Both of these ideological concepts are at best gross exaggerations and do not reflect America’s pragmatic economic tradition.  Yet they are firmly entrenched in the popular mind and the Democratic party is not willing to directly dispute them even though they have brought two near economic collapses in a generation and underpin the Tea Party’s efforts to turn us all back for another pass at economic disaster.  


Last month over a hundred and fifty thousand state and local public sector workers were laid off.  Nearly fifty thousand of these jobs were teaching positions.  However, it was not uncommon to read or hear that this was not such bad news because there were sixty four thousand private sector jobs created in the same period (mostly low paying food and retail service jobs).  Implicitly, the ninety five thousand net loss could be discounted because they were public sector jobs!  


Let examine this concept.  Both kinds of jobs make a living, both kinds pay mortgages and taxes.  So what is the difference?  To most Americans, who have heard the mantra for so long, the answer is self evident.  The private sector jobs produce something of value while the public sectors jobs are just “in the way”.  Sure, you knew that!  


Plainly, the porn star is an eye opening private sector asset but a public school teacher that opens eyes to knowledge is a leach.  The marketing vice president whose job is to sell your children carbonated sugar water at outrageous profit margins, most to be spent on marketing to sell them more, and the physician who treats the resulting diabetes are the economic foundation of domestic prosperity.  But, the public sector physician who works to prevent disease is a hole in our economic boat.  The Wall street investment banker that securitizes dubious mortgages and sells them to your pension plan as “AAA” rated securities is worth tens of millions of dollars of private sector productivity a year, while the bank examiner who is working to assure the integrity of the financial system is a 100k drag on the economy.  The reckless cost cutting BP drilling manager is doing the lords work, but it does not matter if the energy department employees that are suppose to regulate that activity are competent; they are only there to humor those who think government is important. The internet was a federal boondoggle when it was being created but now, with the spammers trying to unlock its marketing potential, it is a boon to humanity.


In this view you can transform a public sector drag into private sector asset by simply contracting out the task, be it a school, a prison, military security or garbage collection.  The metamorphose in value is readily apparent as a professional public service manager making a professional wage will be replaced with an entrepreneurial CEO making an obscene living, paid largely with stock options taxed at a reduce capital gains rate, the later will fire most of the high level personnel, replace them with minimum wage functionaries, join the country club, the Chamber of Commerce and tithe to the Republican party.  Oh, and hire a lobbyist to keep the money coming and avoid any scrutiny into the quality of the job being done.  Thus, instantly the world is a more prosperous place.  Surely you are starting to get the picture.  


It is past time for a little economic truth of the forgoing kind but we aren’t getting it from the Democratic party. How about another sample.  Human initiative and greed are universal.  It follows then that the disparity in economic success between nations is not genetic, despite what our politicians tell us (“most productive workers in the world”).  Rather, hold on to your tea cup now, prosperity is the result of a properly conceived and managed public sector.  Yes, believe it or not, a responsible public sector literally makes it possible to turn paper into gold.  


Our government was constituted, “to promote the general welfare” and empowered to “regulate commerce”.  Government, the law that define and regulates private contractual relationships, creates and regulates a monetary and financial system, weights and measures, public infrastructure for transportation and communication, a public education system, these are the foundational prerequisites of a modern economy.  They are not by products of Adam Smith’s invisible hand.  They have to be paid for with taxes and have to be voted into existence.  Nations with effective public sectors, that educate their people and regulate commerce to assure private activity is productive not destructive and invest in public infrastructure are wealthy.  Those that lack these public sector assets aren’t.  


If a people insists on electing people to public office who don’t believe in government they should not be surprised when they don’t get government.  Without government, you should not be surprised if bridges collapse, damns break, children are not educated, oil ends up on beaches, drinking water is polluted, the economy is undermined with fraud and abuse and your retirement is stolen.  It is that simple.  Hay, but your taxes may be lower.


How about another surprise.  Public sector deficit spending is not an inherent evil and our current deficit is not a bad thing given the economic situation, in fact (hold on to your cup and saucer this time) in the short run it should certainly be higher!  In times of economic chaos, government becomes the investor of last resort stabilizing the economy and restoring confidence.  It is widely accepted that the depression was prolonged by a Tea Party style impulse that prematurely trimmed the seemingly burgeoning deficits (two thirds of the federal budget was being borrowed at one point) leaving it to the even larger deficits brought by the war effort to finally turn the inertia of economic contraction.  


After the war the Nation’s debt dwarfed anything that the depression era tea party mentality could have conceived  but the technological and industrial benefits of the war effort were such that the deficit essentially melted away in the resulting post war economic boom.  Just as an individual or business can profit by borrowing for an education or other investment so can a nation.


So how about those laid off public workers and especially the teachers?  But for the Tea Party mentality, a relatively modest additional borrowing by the federal government could have kept those people in their jobs.  The news would have been that jobs grew by sixty four thousand last month rather than shrank by ninety five thousand and there would be a hundred and fifty nine thousand more people paying taxes and producing something of value instead of drawing unemployment.  There would be fewer mortgages going delinquent and that many more confident consumers. It is entirely conceivable that the net result of having borrowed a little more money to pay these people to work rather than a little less money to pay them not to work would be less public debt not more within a short time.  


But we should not ignore the lost value of what they are not now doing.  Lets assume that on average each of those forty eight thousand teachers would have inspired one student this year to a new ambition or seen one through an educational rough spot, maximizing their personal potential, what is the economic cost of that?  We wisely borrowed to save thousands of autoworkers jobs and the industrial base that would have been lost with those jobs as part of a plainly successful strategy to interrupt an on going economic free fall, but fail now to carry through the logic to borrow a bit more to preserve necessary public service jobs, including nearly fifty thousand teaching positions?   


It makes no sense for government to follow the private sector into contraction, perpetuating the downward economic spiral.  The later course only makes sense to those who have an irrational fear of public expenditure derived from the view that it will mean higher taxes for them or competition for consumer dollars from the public sector.  These are the true self interest motivations for depreciating the value of public sectors services, not economic reality.  Which brings us to the other foundational economic falsehood of the greedy right.


At the end of the First World War the marginal federal income tax rate was 77%!  This began a period of sustained economic growth, so much so that taxes were cut five times before the party ended in the depression.  Taxes were cut because of growth, not the other way around.  At the end of the Second World War the top marginal rate was 95% and remained north of 90% for nearly twenty years until 1964 when it was reduced to 77%!  Again an unprecedented period of prosperity.  After the false period of borrowed prosperity under Reagan and Bush I, Clinton raised taxes retroactively and contrary to the dire predictions of the renown economist, Dr. Rush Limbaugh of Talk Radio University, the country entered another period of exceptional growth, with shrinking deficits and a rising dollar.  There is no evidence that marginal tax rates on truly wealthy incomes has any demonstrable impact on job creation or economic activity.  Responsible government does, as unfortunately does irresponsible government, as we all should now well know.  


But economics is only one issue.  The country cannot have a rational debate about any topic because the Republican party will engage its propaganda machine to distract the voters from the facts and the issues with emotionally charged falsehoods.  Health care reform, education, competitiveness, even war.  You name it, reason is not going to get a hearing. Legitimate difference in philosophical views will not be addressed.  


To anyone with any sense of history, which unfortunately many of our children and young even not so young adults now lack, it is apparent that the human race is on a grand and limitless adventure of discovery.  In her time America has played a leading role in that adventure - until recently.  Post Vietnam, it is now plain, America lost its way and with it any unitary sense of purpose or even of its identity.  We have become in our own eyes and that of others a hedonistic society, defined entirely by what we consume not what we produce or contribute.  It is this and what it means for our children’s future that is truly bothering the American people.  The Tea Partiers my be deluded but they are patriots; it is this sentiment by which they are being manipulated.  


The economic right tells us that our national well being depends upon private consumption.  Low taxes and small government mean more dollars for Walmart, in the short run at least.  However our nation has not historically been defined by what we consumed individually but by what we have built and done together.   When we explore civilizations past, we may dig in refuge for insight but it is their public works and their collective contribution to human knowledge and culture that we judge them buy.  


This country last knew itself, had a sense or purpose and direction, when it was going to the moon, when it was committed to the public education of its children and their physical health, was at war with true totalitarianism, when marginal tax rates on the income of the well to do were north of 90% and the President could stir the public with, “ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country”.  


We will not recover what has been lost in mindless personal consumption, by filling landfills, attics, and storage buildings with chinese made products, nor in building empty condominiums and grotesque homes by the thousands.  Prosperity will not be found in the flat earth economics of the Tea Party, nor will purpose be found in the racist xenophobic politics of the modern Republican party, nor unfortunately in the cowardly non vision of today’s Democratic Party.  America as it was and should be cannot be based on a education system that only teaches the three “Rs” (code for a bare bones occupationally functional education that the Chamber of Commerce will endorse).


The path back to the future for America is not really all that obscure, though to ears unaccustomed to hearing reality it may well sound radical.  It will not be found as long as one political party remains a shameless dissembling special interest propaganda machine and the other lacks the confidence to directly challenge that dissembling with the truth about where we are, where we have been and what a path forward must look like.